To see weddings from a cinematic point of view, to try to transmit the different atmospheres and their attributes, as well as the characters of those attending is a declaration of intentions. “The work of Edward is an important evolution in social reportage photography. Portraits for executives, books for actors, child & pregnancy photos.Ĭommercial photography for companies, album & book covers, corporate brochures & advertising. Photography services for weddings & social events. I do like the light silvery look of Kentmere, but I think the Ilford will win out.Edward Olive – fine art, commercial, portrait & international destination wedding photographer The fact that it is more expensive than Kentmere will be absorbed by not buying the press. I think the new Ilford paper will handle the contrast and the curl problem. For about six months I have been agonizing whether to buy a used Seal dry mount press (models 360-550) at about a $1,000 that will handle 20x24 inch prints to flatten out the curl. Over on APUG Simon Galley has announced that in early 2007 Ilford expects to have print paper that dries flat without curl. I have gotten some satisfaction from reshooting my 8x10 and 7x17 T max 400, over exposing and under developing in the Jobo with Rollo Pyro. A panoramic waterfall with shadows near the edges. Specifically snow on the roof of a greenhouse and rusty bands of metal in the same image. For me this has been situations where I had more zones in the negative than the paper has. For this it is fine, but every so often I want to split grade print with 5 and 00.
I rarely use more than a 2.5 or 3 Ilford filter. Cold light source enlargers can be used, but they may limit the contrast range achievable." By any chance are those of you saying that Kentmere does not have enough contrast range using a cold light head enlarger? I ask because I am and have read this in the Kentmere Fineprint VC FB specs, "Fineprint VC is designed for use with tungsten or tungsten halogen light sources.
0 kommentar(er)
